# brev-separate This is `brev-separate`, a miscellaneous hodge-podge of macros and procedures that all have the shared aim of brevity. Sort of my take on the `clojurian` and `miscmacros` and `(chicken base)` genre. It's called `brev-separate` since the full `brev` egg also imports and reexports a bunch of other eggs, including the aforementioned `clojurian` and `miscmacros`. ## Making macros Chicken has syntax-rules macros and ir-macros. Let's shave off some of the boiler plate so that it's easier to make macros. ### define-syntax-rules There is already the wonderful `define-syntax-rule` in `miscmacros` but here is also `define-syntax-rules`: (define-syntax-rules foo () ((foo bar) (+ bar 3)) ((foo bar baz) (* bar baz))) It's just the ultra lazy person's shorthand for: (define-syntax foo (syntax-rules () ((foo bar) (+ bar 3)) ((foo bar baz) (* bar baz)))) ### define-ir-syntax* `define-ir-syntax*` is more interesting. (define-ir-syntax* name (pattern body) ...) It uses `matchable` to dispatch between different call signatures (kinda similar to how `syntax-rules` work) while also allowing you to `inject`, `compare`, `strip-syntax` and `syntax` inside, as per usual with ir-macros. Here's an example: (define-ir-syntax* (aif test yes no) `(let ((,(inject 'it) ,test)) (if ,(inject 'it) ,yes ,no))) (aif (... expensive test ...) (car it) (print "oh! no!")) When you have multiple call-signatures, wrap pattern / body set with parens. (define-ir-syntax* ((aif #f yes no) no) ((aif test yes no) `(let ((,(inject 'it) ,test)) (if ,(inject 'it) ,yes ,no)))) ### define-ir-syntax Sometimes pattern matching is overkill or you have something else in mind. `define-ir-syntax` macros are just (define-ir-syntax name body) where the body has access to `body`, `inject`, `compare`, `strip-syntax` and `syntax`, as in the following example: (define-ir-syntax comp-prod (apply * body)) (comp-prod 2 3 4) ⇒ 24 As a rule of thumb, if you are deliberately injecting new names into the namespace that's when you are using ir-macros, and when you want to *avoid* doing that, use syntax-rules. ## Making procedures ### define-closure (define-closure bindings head body ...) This works like your normal (define head body ...) except that `bindings` are lexically closed over body. (define-closure (x 0) (counter) (inc! x)) (counter) (counter) (counter) ⇒ 1 2 3 The pairs of bindings aren't individual paren-wrapped, just alternating between name and expression. The set of bindings as a whole has parens. (define-closure (x 0 y 10) (jolly) (list (inc! x) (dec! y))) (jolly) (jolly) (jolly) ⇒ (1 9) (2 8) (3 7) ### match-define Deprecated♥ Calling `match-define` directly is deprecated in favor of [using the macro from match-generics](../match-generics), which can expand to it or to normal `define` as needed. (But `match-define` is still used internally to avoid circular dependencies.) ### `call-table`, `call-table*`, `call-vector`, `call-string`, `call-list`, and `call-record` A closure interface to hash-tables. (define arity (call-table)) (define color (call-table)) (arity cons 2) (color cons 'blue) ((over (x cons)) (list arity color)) ⇒ (2 blue) `call-table` takes two optional keyword argument, `default:`, to set the default response for unknown keys, and `seed:` which can be a hash-table or an alist, and defaults to empty. There is also `call-table*` which by default cons its values to a list instead of replacing them. It takes four keyword arguments. `proc:` which defaults to `cons`, initial which defaults to `'()`, and unary which defaults to `#f`, and `seed:` as above. Both versions of call-table lets you access the underlying hash-table by calling them with no arguments, and to set them by calling them with the keyword argument `update:`. (color update: my-other-hash-table) [Full documentation for call-tables](https://idiomdrottning.org/call-table) [Full documentation for callable arrays](https://idiomdrottning.org/call-vector) ### call-key* Sometimes you think `call-table` is convenient but you only need one key. For `call-key`, just use `make-parameter`. But `call-key*` is awesome since it accumulates its values. It has the same `proc`, `unary`, and `initial` keyword arguments as `call-table*`. It doesn't have `seed` because the idea is that you just use `inititial`. The generated procedure has `update` (which takes a new list as argument) and `get` (which you only need for `unary` call-keys). (define horses (call-key*)) (horses 'ruby) (horses 'kind-girl) (horses 'tornado) (horses) ⇒ (tornado kind-girl ruby) ### ct, ctq, ct\*, ctq\* This is sugar for creating call-tables with some values already filled. The q variants are implicitly quasiquoted while the non-q variants aren't. I.e. (let ((banana-color 'yellow)) (ctq banana ,banana-color apple red)) is equivalent to (let ((banana-color 'yellow)) (call-table seed: `((banana . ,banana-color) (apple . red)))) and (let ((banana-color 'yellow)) (ct 'banana banana-color 'apple 'red)) The * variants create `call-table*` instances instead, and splice one level of lists: (ctq* banana yellow apple (green red)) These call-tables aren't closed, you can add more keys and values to them. ### define-some This is for making functions that implicitly returns '() on an `empty?` first argument. In other words, it defines a body for patterns with **some** non-empty value as first argument, hence the name `define-some`. For example, (define-some (descseq num) (cons num (descseq (sub1 num)))) is shorthand for (define (descseq num) (if (empty? num) '() (cons num (descseq (sub1 num))))) so (descseq 5) ⇒ (5 4 3 2 1) ### define-parameters (define-parameters foo 0 bar #t baz '() quux 'banana) is shorthand for (define foo (make-parameter 0)) (define bar (make-parameter #t)) (define baz (make-parameter '())) (define quux (make-parameter 'banana)) ### define-curry It's nice that you can make specific curries with the SRFI-219 style define heads (which is implemented per default in Chicken). That's nice if you know exactly how many stragglers and how many immediate args you have, but sometimes you need the currying itself to be arbitrary arity. Let's say you already have something like: (define (foo bar baz bax) (print baz) (+ bar baz bax)) but you realize you need arbitrary-arity currying. Just change it to use `define-curry` instead of `define`: (define-curry (foo bar baz bax) (print baz) (+ bar baz bax)) (= (foo 100 20 3) ((foo 100) 20 3) ((foo 100 20) 3) ((foo) 100 20 3) (((foo) 100) 20 3) (((foo 100) 20) 3) ((((foo) 100) 20) 3)) Prints seven 20 and returns `#t`. It only works when `foo` otherwise would have fixed arity. ### `c` a.k.a. `🍛` a.k.a. `@>` This isn't the traditional c-combinator from mockingbirds and such. It's just a one-letter spelling of "curry". It's a function combinator. ((c + 1 20 300) 4000 50000) ⇒ 54321 I also exported it using the name 🍛 for those who find emoji names more comfortable to use due to namespace issues. I later found out that `@>` from the `holes` egg is same the combinator as this. Then, a few months later than that, I found out that `partial` from Clojure is the same combinator as this. It has arbitrary arity and can work on arbitrary arity functions, but isn't recursive to multiple levels. ### fn (fn body ...) is shorthand for (lambda some-basic-bindings body ...) where some-basic-bindings is one of - args - (x . rest) - (x y . rest) - (x y z . rest) and the fn macro automatically figures out which of those four you mean. The function can refer to itself as `f`. (In other words, if the body refers to `f`, the expansion gets wrapped in `(letrec ((f …)) f)`.) ### over (over body ...) is shorthand for (c map (lambda some-basic-bindings body ...)) except that the map can take any number of lists (or other sequences, like strings) and that `i` is also anaphorically bound to the list index in `body`. Here is an example: ((over (+ x x y i)) '(10 20 40) '(3 6 9)) ⇒ (23 47 91) Like `fn`, the function can refer to itself as `f`. ((over (display x) (eif x (f (sub1 x)) x)) '(2 4 3)) displays 210432103210 and returns `(0 0 0)`. ### as-list Here is a functional combinator for Scheme that lets its arguments treat their arguments as if they were lists. ((as-list (c filter odd?)) 130752) ⇒ 1375 ((as-list cdr reverse) 23311358) ⇒ 5311332 ((as-list delete-duplicates) 23311358) ⇒ 23158 (define (vowel? l) ((as-list (c member l)) "aeiou")) ((as-list (c filter vowel?)) "magnetic mountaintop") ⇒ “aeiouaio” Together with `over`: ((over (if (vowel? x) x (char-upcase x))) "fleet foxes") ⇒ “FLeeT FoXeS” ### as-string Sinilar to `as-list` but for when you wanna use string procedures on lists of characters, or on symbols. ### memoize and memoize! Similar to what's in other libraries, brev-separate ships a memoize, to cache function results for args. (memoize! proc) is a macro that expands to (define proc (memoize proc)), which is good for recursive functions. ### make-tree-accessor Sometimes you just need an arbitrarily long tree dereferencer. (make-tree-accessor cddadadaddddar) makes `cddadadaddddar` real. Works for any sequence of a's and d's. ### make-sloppy-tree-accessor As above, but uses scar and scdr instead of car and cdr. ### newline1 and skip1 `newline1` is a version of Scheme's `newline` that does nothing the first time it's called. (for-each (fn (newline1) (display x)) '(a b c d e)) prints a b c d e `skip1` is a general combinator that makes these: (define tab1 (skip1 (fn (newline) (display " ")))) (for-each (fn (tab1) (display x)) '(ol li li li)) prints ol li li li To reset them (so they'll skip their next invocation), call them with a single argument, `'reset`. (newline1 'reset) (tab1 'reset) `skip1` can take any number of procedures with any number of arguments, it runs `((compose proc1 proc2 …) arg1 arg2 …)`. For example, (define conv1 (skip1 print add1 *)) (for-each conv1 '(1 2 3) '(10 20 30)) prints 41 91 ## Making values ### with-result This is something that is sometimes cozy: (with-result (print 1 2 (save 3) 4 5 6) (print 7 8)) Prints 123456 and 78, returns 3 ### aif-with-result (aif-with-result (odd? (save 3)) (+ it 4) (+ it 1000)) ⇒ 7 That tests the entire expression but only stores the saved part into `it`. Combining `aif` and `with-result` would do the opposite: (aif (with-result (pred? (save 27))) it #f) That tests 27 and stores 27 into `it`, while the pred? call is thrown away. ### keep `(keep proc args…)` runs proc for its sideeffects and returns the last arg. For example, `(+ 3 (keep print 'hi 4))` prints hi4 and returns 7. It is curried on the procedure so you can `((keep proc) args…)`. A shorthand for `with-result` when you only have one expression and only care about the last (or only) arg. ### empty? This is a generic predicate to see if a string is "", a list is '(), a number is 0 etc. ### `eif`, `econd`, `ewhen`, `eor` and `eand` `eif` is a version of `if` (or, to be precise, of `aif` since it is anaphoric) that treats empty things as falsy. (eif "" it 'no) ⇒ no `econd`, similarly, is an "empty is falsy" version of `acond`. There's also `ewhen`, `eor` and `eand`. (eor 0 (add1 it)) ⇒ 1 ### like? `like?` is a unary curried version of `equal?` ### is? `is?` is a unary curried version of `eq?` ### `scdr`, and `scar` A scar is like a car but returns '() if the pair has no car. A scdr is like a cdr but returns '() if the pair has no cdr. ### normalize-absolute-pathname (normalize-absolute-pathname filename) Uses current-directory to try to figure out an absolute path for filename. ### slice Here is an generic slice multimethod for Scheme. (slice '(hello now there you are) 1 3) ⇒ (now there) (slice "so this is where you are hiding" 3 7) ⇒ (#\t #\h #\i #\s) (let ((str "so this is where you are hiding")) (set! (slice str 3 7) "that") str) ⇒ "so that is where you are hiding" (slice 1243153 -3 -0) ⇒ (1 5 3) Because of Scheme's call-by-value semantics, `set!` doesn't work on numbers.♥ ### descend Descend is sort of like a named `let` except it does three magic things. First of all, the let tag is always `desc`. I almost named the macro itself `desc` but that would've been bad since then you couldn't nest them. Second of all, if the binding is to a value of the same name e.g. `(lis lis)` you can just put the name there. You can mix these shorthand bindings with normal bindings. Now, if the first binding starts of as `empty?`, the third magic thing (which I'll get into shortly) is disabled and you can go on your merry way only using the above two magics. (descend ((sum 0) (nums '(1 2 3 4))) (if (null? nums) sum (desc (+ sum (car nums)) (cdr nums)))) ⇒ 10 Otherwise, if it does start out non-empty... (descend ((nums '(1 2 3 4))) (+ (car nums) (desc (cdr nums)))) ⇒ 10 That's right. It only recurs the value is non-empty. ### ?-> `?->` is a combinator that takes a predicate test and a transformer, and returns a unary procedure that transforms its argument if the predicate applies. That's a mouthful. Let's break it down with some examples:prcx You can make a `car` that only cars if the list is not null: (map (?-> (o not null?) car) '((a b c) () (1 2 3) () ())) ⇒ (a () 1 () ()) Or a reverse that only reverses if it receives a list: (map (?-> list? reverse) '(a (l u f r e d n o w) "summer's" (y a d))) ⇒ (a (w o n d e r f u l) "summer's" (d a y)) The default when the predicate doesn't apply is to just pass through the argument, but you can set a different default with a keyword argument: (map (?-> (o not null?) car #:default #f) '((a b c) () (1 2 3) () ())) ⇒ (a #f 1 #f #f) ### with and this Sort of like a one-branch `aif` or an always-true `awhen`. (with (+ 13 14) (print it) (+ it it)) Prints `27` and returns 54. There's also `this` that uses the word `that` as the anaphor instead, since the anaphor `it` is so often already taken in anaphoric programming. ### string->read Shorthand for `(fn (with-input-from-string x read))`. ### string->dwim Like `string->read`, but leave it as a string if it wouldn't make sense. (For example, contains spaces, periods, or parantheses.) ## ref* Ref* is a universal version of list-ref*, hash-table-ref* etc. It can handle lists, alists, hash-tables, strings, vectors, records, and all callable procedures (like call-tables). You can also pass multiple arguments to deref*erence recursively. Designed by Chris Brannon. The order is left to right, like Java's dots or Clojure's arrow, unlike compose or nested calls. That is to say, the left-most is the outermost. Here's an extended example. (define foo (make-hash-table)) (set! (hash-table-ref* foo 'bar) '((x . #(1 2 3)) (y . #(4 5 6)))) (ref* foo 'bar) ⇒ ((x . #(1 2 3)) (y . #(4 5 6))) (ref* foo 'bar 'y) ⇒ #(4 5 6) (ref* foo 'bar 'y 0) ⇒ 4 There's also the `refx` partially applied variant: it takes only the indices and returns a procedure of one argument. For example, you could make a `car` that worked on strings and vectors too, like this: `(refx 0)` and you could make a `caddar` like this: `(refx 2 0)`. ## Doing stuff ### for-each-line (for-each-line filename body ...) `body` is called for its sideeffects once per line of text in `filename` with the variable `line` anaphorically bound to that line. ### for-each-stdin (for-each-stdin body ...) `body` is called for its sideeffects once per line of text in standard input (a.k.a. `(current-input-port)`) with the variable `line` anaphorically bound to that line. For example: (for-each-line "/tmp/foo" (print line)) ### niy (niy) NIY stands for "not implemented yet". Errors out if called with no arguments or if any of its arguments are true. Sort of like a living FIXME. ### die (die "Write your message here") Like `print`, but writes to error port and calls (exit 1). ## Source code git clone https://idiomdrottning.org/brev-separate